Unlock the insights your
team loses in conversations.
Stop wasting hours digging for info and manually organizing context.
A full-picture answer—pulled from meetings, Slack, and docs—so you focus on what matters.
A Smarter Way to Access Knowledge
Cross-Source Unified Search
One click to find answers across all your meetings, docs, and chats. No more context-switching.
Multi-Meeting Intelligence
Meetings are fragmented by nature. Contexta aggregates discussions scattered across several syncs
No Manual Organization
Say goodbye to the burden of never sorting post-meeting resources and copy & pasting from slack.
Traceable Sources
Every insight is linked back to its source—video timestamps, doc passages, and chat messages.
How Teams Use Contexta
Enable Info Sharing Across the Org
Improving efficiency of the whole org by reducing time spent digging for info.
Faster Onboarding
Help new hires get up to speed by asking questions about past projects, decisions, and team processes.
Project Alignment
Keep teams aligned by easily tracking decisions and action items across long-running projects.
Technical Deep Dives
Engineers can instantly find technical discussions, architectural decisions, and shared research papers.
See Contexta in Action
Watch how Contexta easily unlocks info for your team by pulling a comprehensive summary from multiple sources in real-time.
What were the concerns around data privacy in our Q2 planning meetings?
The current consensus is to definitely NOT store the video files themselves directly in the database. Storing videos significantly increases database volume and processing time. Instead, the primary information of interest from videos is their transcripts. While the video might be temporarily downloaded to extract the transcript, the video itself will not be stored in the main database but will remain on Google Drive. The focus is on retrieving the transcript as text and having a reference (like a share link with timestamps) to the original video on Google Drive for display.
Sources
Was there any disagreement?
Yes, there was a disagreement regarding the implementation timeline for the new encryption keys, but not the necessity of the keys themselves.
Sources
At 29:40 – Discussion on data privacy
if you store the video it takes significantly in the database it takes really significantly longer and it also increases a lot more than 20 times the volume of your database. So let's definitely not do that
By Autogenerated · Last updated Jul 7
"...Louis Martinez emphasized that while Google Drive data, including videos and transcripts, should be stored in a Chroma DB due to its unstructured nature and continuous saving, storing Slack data in the same database is not scalable or necessarily relevant (00:10:30)..."
"...Video Transcript Storage: Storing and searching through video transcripts for content discovery..."
Louis
When you prompt the model, it triggers two tasks: 1. it queries the database which is assumed to contain all the relevant information already, and summaries the relevant information 2. it scans through the wiki to check for any discrepancy between the current version and improvements mentioned during meetings (retrieved from the db at step 1). Then it suggests an updated version of the wiki. Then we can accept/reject it and the model acts accordingly